Skip to main content

Overriding SysLastValue Dynamics AX 3.0

This is an old blog entry from my old blog.

Today I solved a problem, that has long puzzled me.

From Axapta 3.0 (or was it 2.5 can't quite remember) it became best pratice to wrap reports in runbase-report classes.

For a long time it has irritated me, that if you called your report class from something else than the menu, you were having trouble overriding syslastvalue, without clearing all saved last value completely.

Example:
You have a report called from a runbasereport class.For the class you naturally have a output menuitem, that is attached to the menu. So when you call this report, and make selections in the ranges of the query of the report, they are shown in the report dialog, and saved, so that the next time you call your report, the last used selections is being restored for you in the dialog for reuse.

However sometime you experience, that the report can be called from BOTH the menu and somewhere else like a form.
When you call the report from a form, it is customary to synchronize certain ranges in the query of the report with values found on the particular record the cursor has been placed in the form.

Then what about syslastvalue in this case. Normally they would be saved as the last used values destroying the values saved when the report was called from the menu.

So how do we make the report function normally saving queryvalues etc as syslastvalues when calling it from the menu, and avoid doing so when calling the report from e.g. a form.

The solution is actually fairly simple, and does not require a whole lot of work:

If you make an extra output menuitem for your report class, which includes a parameter indicating that this has NOT been called from the menu, by putting a value in e.g. the PARM property and test for this it is quite easy.

First you need a parameter method to set and return a flag indicating if or if not the class has been called from the menu:

boolean calledromMenu(boolean _calledFromMenu = calledFromMenu)
{
    calledFromMenu = _calledFromMenu;
    return calledFromMenu;
}

Of course you must have a class member of the boolean type called calledFromMenu.

In your

main

method in the runbasereport class you would have:

MyRunBaseReportObject myRunBaseReportObject;

myRunBaseReportObjec = new myRunBaseReportObject();
if (_args.parm() != '')
{
    myRunBaseReportObject.calledFromMenu(false);
}
else
{
    myRunBaseReportObject.calledFromMenu(true);
}
if (myRunBaseReportObject.prompt())
{
    myRunBaseReportObject.run();
}


The

getLast

method on your wrapper class (extending RunBaseReport) must be overwritten:
public void getLast()
{
    getLastCalled = true;
    inGetSaveLast = true;
    if (this.calledFromMenu()) // Do not save last value if not called from menu

    {
        xSysLastValue::getLast(this);
    }
    else
    {
        this.initParmDefault();
    }
    inGetSaveLast = false;
}


In this case the calledFromMenu() method returns either true or false according to the parameter passed from the menuitem, which indicates that the report is called from the menu.

If it has been called from the menu, we want everything to function as normal, so we get the syslastvalues. Otherwise, we call initParmDefault to setup report with query and queryRun objects etc.

It is important that super() is NOT called.

The other method to overwrite is:

public void saveLast()
{
    if (this.calledFromMenu()) // Only save last value if called from menu
    {
        inGetSaveLast = true;
        xSysLastValue::saveLast(this);
        inGetSaveLast = false;
    }
}

Actually the overwriting this method with the above code, just makes saving syslastvalues dependant on the calledFromMenu, thus NOT saving anything if the report was not called from the menu.

That's it. Now your report will function as normally saving syslastvalues when called from the menu, but not doing so when you call it using the other menuitem which indicates a call from somewhere else than the menu.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Suppressing the infolog

Supressing the infolog is often useful in D365FO when augmenting code. When augmenting code using COC (Chain Of Command), you can have new code run either before or after the code you are augmenting. This means that any infolog-messages that the standard application code does, will be shown to the user, even if your augmentation supports a scenario where there must be no infolog-messages. How do you avoid the standard application infolog-messages ? To the rescue comes temporary supression of the infolog. The suppression consists of: 1) Saving the current infologLevel 2) Setting the infologLevel to SysInfologLevel::None 3) Run your code 4) Restoring the saved infologLevel to the infolog For example a table could have a validatewrite-method that validates that you are only allowed to use 3 out of 6 options in an enum-field, and you need to allow for a fourth one. Table a - validateWrite method: boolean validateWrite() {     Switch (this.enumField)     {         boolean ret;         case

Dynamics ax 2012 traversing selected records in a form data source

A classical developer challenge in Dynamics AX is to enable a form button when multiple records have been selected in the form by the user. This usually involves writing some form of loop (for or while or do-while) that starts out with calling _ds.getFirst() and continuing the loop as long as _ds.getNext() returns a tablebuffer. Well things got a little bit easier in AX 2012. In AX 2012 you can use the MultiSelectionHelper class. One example is the following that I encountered in AX 2012: Can you make the customer collection letter print out run for each selected collection record in the Print/Post collection letters form (Accounts receiveable / Periodic / Collections / Print/Post Collection letters). If we ignore the possibility for setting up print destination for running each report we can do this in two steps: 1) Change the "Multiselect" property of the "MenuButton" and the "Menuitembutton" in the MenuButton in the form from "Auto&quo

Indicating mandatory field in a dialog (RunBase) class.

A classical problem is indicating that a field is mandatory in a dialog, when the field is not bound to a datasource/field in a datasource. Normally fellow developers will tell you that, that is not possible. I found a way to do this. In your Runbase-based class you can implement the putToDialog-method e.g like this: protected void putToDialog() { super(); fieldMask.fieldControl().mandatory(true); } where fieldMask is a DialogField object in your dialog. This will make the field act like it was a mandatory field from a datasource in a form, showing a red-wavy line under the field, and requiring the field to have a value. Attention: Your class has to run on the client.If you set your class to run on the server, you get a run-time error, when the fieldMask.FieldControl()-call is made.